Taxonomic Swap 24401 (Committed on 2017-09-06)

"ipomaeae" seems to be the spelling in the original description, despite abundant usage of "ipomoeae" across the web and in a lot of literature (Powell & Opler's Moths of Western North American, Wagner's Caterpillars of Eastern North America, etc).

@hughmcguinness, @lepalot, @seabrookeleckie, what do you guys think of this? Am I missing some taxonomic switcheroo since the species was described?

BugGuide (Citation)
Yes
Added by kueda on August 27, 2017 07:13 PM | Committed by kueda on September 6, 2017
replaced with

Comments

Nice catch. That appears to be correct. The switch you are suggesting is consistent with Pohl et al (2016).

Posted by hughmcguinness over 6 years ago

Cool. Posted in BugGuide to get their input too: http://bugguide.net/node/view/1431511. Formally, we do follow BugGuide for North American insects, so it would be good if they changed as well.

Posted by kueda over 6 years ago

We should formally change to follow the Pohl et al checklist for North America IMHO.

Posted by hughmcguinness over 6 years ago

BugGuide updated: http://bugguide.net/node/view/28016. Thanks for the input, Hugh. We don't follow the Pohl list, but it's probably worth considering for situations where there's conflict between authorities. For those interested it seems to be available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302570819_Annotated_taxonomic_checklist_of_the_Lepidoptera_of_North_America_North_of_Mexico.

Posted by kueda over 6 years ago

BugGuide is pretty great at keeping taxonomy up-to-date, but you can imagine it's a huge task to maintain for all of insect-dom. I agree the Pohl list should be considered the new authority for moths. They're right on top of things, too. Greg Pohl was incredibly helpful with providing documents, spreadsheets, etc, when I reached out to him for the new Southeast guide.

Posted by seabrookeleckie over 6 years ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments