Fischer et al. (2004) follow Gentry ’ s recommendation ( Goldblatt and Gentry, 1979 ; Gentry, 1980 ) that Tecomaria should be included in Tecoma . However, our results indicate that Tecomaria is closer to Podranea , the only other African member of this clade.
Richard G. Olmstead, Michelle L. Zjhra,7 L ú cia G. Lohmann, Susan O. Grose, 2\ and Andrew J. Eckert A MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF BIGNONIACEAE. American Journal of Botany 96(9): 1731–1743. 2009.
unknown
Yes
Added by tonyrebelo on May 29, 2018 12:48 PM
|
Committed by tonyrebelo on May 29, 2018
As noted here there is plenty of evidence that the Plant List (and ITIS and USDA for that matter) incorrectly include this species in Tecoma. I agree with the reversion.
Unintended disagreements occur when a parent (B) is
thinned by swapping a child (E) to another part of the
taxonomic tree, resulting in existing IDs of the parent being interpreted
as disagreements with existing IDs of the swapped child.
Identification
ID 2 of taxon E will be an unintended disagreement with ID 1 of taxon B after the taxon swap
If thinning a parent results in more than 10 unintended disagreements, you
should split the parent after swapping the child to replace existing IDs
of the parent (B) with IDs that don't disagree.
Awaiting input and permission from @marcoschmidtffm and @stevejones before committing.
more at: https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_swaps/30549#comment-1808244