Welcome + Links

Hi everyone, there are only a few hours left until ID-blitz December 2021 begins. If you are tagged in this post, you joined the project in time to become an official participant! Woo-hoo!

Now what? We have a count-down running on the project home page that you can watch to see when the event begins. Once the count-down has reached zero, start identifying! You do not have to do anything special for your IDs to be counted, just do your usual thing or check out the links below.

As you are identifying, if you see an observation that's particularly wow-worthy, you may add it to this project to share it with other participants. Please do not add more than a few observations total to the project--we are not using the project to count IDs so there's no need to add everything you see.

Unknowns

Tomorrow right when the event starts, I will note the total number of unknowns in the iNaturalist database. At the end of the event, we can see how much the total went down!

To ID unknowns, you can use this link here. (It's a bit slow to load, so if you don't see anything right away, be patient.) This link is provided for convenience, but you're welcome to make changes to it or use an entirely different search. For example, if you want to see a particular part of the word, add a place filter after you open the link. I have it showing observations older than Oct 31st to avoid stepping on new uploads. However, I don’t plan to worry about the observation age when noting start/end numbers or participation totals.

Kingdoms

Tomorrow right when the event starts, I will note the total number of observations ranked exactly at kingdom level. At the end of the event, we can compare the new total to the old total. What do you think, will the number go up, because we are putting a lot of coarse IDs on unknowns? Or can we make the number go down?

To make IDs, you can use this link. If you'd like to see one kingdom at a time, type it into the search box after you open the link. You may also add geographic filters or whatever else you like.

Here's another cool link, showing observations at exactly kingdom Plantae that do have at least one lower ID.

Or if you prefer, here are observations exactly at Kingdom Plantae that also have at least one ID of Tracheophyta.

If you'd like help making a custom link, let's talk about it in the comments below.

Collaboration

To pull up observations recently ID’d by other participants, click here. If you have the skill to ID to lower levels, I encourage you to use that link and refine the community taxon as you are able. It will be nice for people sorting unknowns to see some observations get refined quickly. Technically this pulls up all observations ever ID’d by participants, not just those done during the event, but I do have it sorting by recently updated. If you would like to see specific taxa or geographic areas, add those filters after opening the link.

Questions?

If anything is unclear, please ask in the comments below. Thanks everyone and have fun tomorrow!

@abhijatshakya, @annkatrinrose, @antrozousamelia, @arboretum_amy, @avocat, @beetle_mch, @blastcat, @bouteloua, @caja-manga, @calopogon, @dallonweekes, @danieldas, @deboas, @dianastuder, @driftlessroots, @egordon88, @elschongar, @emilyearthquake, @fluffyinca, @fseichter, @fuzzyspider, @glisby, @hederahelix, @helmwige, @ionam, @jbecky, @jmillsand, @jonathan_mack, @kevinfaccenda, @kitbeard, @kristalwatrous, @lappelbaum, @leahmfulton, @lera, @lisa_bennett, @lothlin, @lynnharper, @machi, @marina_gorbunova, @mchs_citizen_science_club, @mmmmbugs, @naturejeanne, @navaneethsinigeorge, @ncb1221, @odonut, @paloma, @peakaytea, @rainhead, @richyfourtytwo, @roysh, @sambiology, @sdjbrown, @sue1001, @teawren, @trh_blue, @trscavo, @valentinamgn, @vireyajacquard, @wildskyflower, @wkostick, @zoe_clark1

Posted on December 9, 2021 03:34 AM by arboretum_amy arboretum_amy

Comments

Woohoo! I have my fingers at the ready!

Posted by lisa_bennett over 2 years ago

Go, team, go!

Posted by dysm over 2 years ago

Looking forward to it! And I just realised it starts before I thought it did. For me it is 11am Friday (for some reason I thought it started on Saturday).

Posted by vireyajacquard over 2 years ago

For me it is 1pm on Friday - where are you @vireyajacquard? I’m in New Zealand.

Posted by lisa_bennett over 2 years ago

East coast of Australia. In country Victoria, about 100k west of Melbourne.

Posted by vireyajacquard over 2 years ago

For me it's 4 pm Thursday! That's why the count-down comes in handy. Thanks @beetle_mch for making it

Posted by arboretum_amy over 2 years ago

So handy! I got confused with the starting times of the other ones. Thanks @beetle_mch !

Posted by lisa_bennett over 2 years ago

I'm excited! I had more irl plans pop up this weekend than I expected, but I'll still do my best. Go team!

Posted by antrozousamelia over 2 years ago

I've been getting some practice in already! I have a question about what kind of stuff to add to the project. Do they have to be things we were able to ID, or can they be unknowns that look cool and interesting but have us completely stumped as to even which kingdom they should go into?

Posted by annkatrinrose over 2 years ago

Interesting. Of observations currently stuck at kingdom, 31% of animals, 21% of plants, and 11% of State of Matter Life were placed there by at least one ID from someone in this group! Followed by 9.5% of fungi, 6% of bacteria, 4% of chromista, 3% of archaea, 2% of viruses, and 1% of protozoans. The group with the highest percentage of IDs currently at a rank more specific than kingdom made by someone in this group is Bacteria, at 5%. The lowest % is a statistical tie between fungi and chromista at just 1%, below the group average across all kingdoms of 2.5%. So I think thats a pretty good signal this groups ID tendencies are not distributed at random, and results are likely to be kingdom specific.

My best bet is that Fungi at kingdom will increase and Bacteria at kingdom will decrease, Plants and Animals will depend on how people choose to spend their time and the others all have such small numbers to start with that what happens is fairly stochastic.

Posted by wildskyflower over 2 years ago

I only have an iPhone with access to the app, and the link to unknowns did not load anything in the iPhone browser, Safari.

Posted by elschongar over 2 years ago

Ready to add to the rich store of knowledge that is iNat!

Posted by lynnharper over 2 years ago

I wonder if 61 determined, obsessive, productive, knowledgeable people can reduce the number of Unknowns by 1% in 48 hours. Hmm.

Posted by lynnharper over 2 years ago

@annkatrinrose you don't have to identify the observation to add it to the project.

Posted by arboretum_amy over 2 years ago

@elschongar I'm sorry that link didn't load for you. The good news is that the exact link doesn't matter! Feel free to use a different search.

Posted by arboretum_amy over 2 years ago

I'm excited for this. I love to do IDs, but for this event I got my mom (calopogon) to sign up to help. I'm always encouraging her to use iNaturalist. Maybe after this event she will get hooked. 😄

Posted by lappelbaum over 2 years ago

@lappelbaum maybe we should do a friendly challenge. What say you?

Posted by calopogon over 2 years ago

Thanks, I will stick to what I am familiar with

Posted by elschongar over 2 years ago

IRL plans popped up here too but will do my best to join in!

Posted by lera over 2 years ago

I found an interesting observation but I don’t know how to add it. I have only added my own observations to a project.

Posted by elschongar over 2 years ago

In the web interface on the observation on the right, theres community taxon, then annotations, then projects, click add to project and it should show a menu of things you are a part of

Posted by wildskyflower over 2 years ago

@elschongar you can go to the observation and add it to the projects on the right side by typing in the name of the project. Unless the user has blocked other people from adding their obs to projects they are not in.

Posted by lappelbaum over 2 years ago

Thank you, that worked. Possible Cretan Crown Vetch in Texas.

Posted by elschongar over 2 years ago

Question: I have run into hundreds of duplicates from the same user/date while reviewing unknowns in Denmark. The user in question has been suspended, so they wouldn't be able to react to all the comments already left on these about duplicate, please delete etc. What's the best way to handle this? This seems like something best handled by curators/staff but flagging hundreds of observations would be a major task.

Posted by annkatrinrose over 2 years ago

help @ inaturalist can maybe resolve that @annkatrinrose

Posted by dianastuder over 2 years ago

Thanks! I sent an email - hopefully they can help sort this out.

Posted by annkatrinrose over 2 years ago

Couple of questions.
1) If you are listening to a recording and don't hear anything besides what could be traffic, how do you classify it?
2) there are many unknown observations in my area that are related to some bee project where they take a photo of where the bee used to be. The photos typically have many plants in it and note stuff about bees and whether they collected the bees or not – but there are no bees in the photos. It’s pretty clear they are not posting to ID the plants, or for any ID purposes. How should I handle those?
Here are a couple of examples: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?per_page=100&iconic_taxa=unknown&order=asc&without_taxon_id=48460&place_id=10
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/88091090
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/90552628

Posted by sue1001 over 2 years ago

Or if someone is taking an observation of beautiful soil horizons (which they were). It's not alive...

Posted by sue1001 over 2 years ago

Ugh, I remember there was this project in China where they were photographing buildings that birds had flown into, but the birds were not in the photos :/

Posted by arboretum_amy over 2 years ago

For the soil horizons, in the DQA you can vote "Evidence of organism? No." The bee question is definitely complicated though!

Posted by arboretum_amy over 2 years ago

I add IDs for some of the stuff matching your filter; some I voted 'no evidence of organism', where possible nests were visible I mostly IDd to pterygota. The ones where the caption indicates they heard a bee and the picture is literally just a plant are a weird edge case, I guess it is basically equivalent to a no photos obs that should be casual, so I mostly added 'Life' and voted 'cannot be improved', which will make it casual if someone agrees with 'Life' (actually, if they add any ID and don't vote against 'cannot be improved').

Posted by wildskyflower over 2 years ago

Thank you @wildskyflower!

Posted by sue1001 over 2 years ago

Add a Comment

Sign In or Sign Up to add comments